1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2012 BMW X5
To start off, 2012 BMW X5 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW X5 (304 HP @ 440 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW X5 weights approximately 1625 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Citroen 2CV | 2012 BMW X5 | |
| Make | Citroen | BMW |
| Model | 2CV | X5 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 304 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 440 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4857 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1933 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1776 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2933 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 85 L |
