1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando (128 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 1105 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Citroen 2CV | 2012 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | Citroen | Chevrolet |
| Model | 2CV | Orlando |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4652 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1633 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2760 mm |
