1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2012 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC70 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC70 (240 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 1321 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen 2CV | 2012 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | XC70 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1881 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2815 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |