1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1177 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Citroen 2CV | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Citroen | Chevrolet |
| Model | 2CV | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1737 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4771 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2857 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 71 L |
