1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2013 Ford Focus
To start off, 2013 Ford Focus is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford Focus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Focus (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Focus should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Focus weights approximately 780 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen 2CV | 2013 Ford Focus | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 2CV | Focus |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4359 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1466 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 47 L |