1964 Citroen 2CV vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (296 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 278 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo S60 weights approximately 1173 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Volvo S60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen 2CV | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | S60 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | W |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1733 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2097 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1484 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2776 mm |