1964 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 1495 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Because 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen Ak 350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ak 350 | 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | Citroen | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Ak 350 | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 1964 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 81 L |