1964 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 3,493 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (550 HP) has 528 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Because 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen Ak 350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm) has 596 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm). This means 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ak 350 | 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | Ak 350 | R 390 GT1 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 3493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 550 HP |
Torque | 41 Nm | 637 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2720 mm |