1964 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Citroen Ak 350 | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Citroen | Jeep |
| Model | Ak 350 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 191 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 41 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 72 L |
