1964 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2005 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2005 Nissan Almera is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 1,769 cc, 2005 Nissan Almera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Almera (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Almera should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Almera weights approximately 525 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Almera (162 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Almera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ak 350 | 2005 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | Ak 350 | Almera |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1769 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 1130 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |