1964 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2005 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2005 Renault Scenic is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Scenic (101 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Scenic weights approximately 751 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Scenic (191 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ak 350 | 2005 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | Ak 350 | Scenic |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 19.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 1356 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 5.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |