1964 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2006 Ford F-250
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 459 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ak 350 | 2006 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Ak 350 | F-250 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 4198 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 500 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 17.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 6250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 114 L |