1964 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2006 Lexus RX
To start off, 2006 Lexus RX is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lexus RX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lexus RX weights approximately 935 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lexus RX (323 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ak 350 | 2006 Lexus RX | |
Make | Citroen | Lexus |
Model | Ak 350 | RX |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 3310 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 323 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 73 L |