1964 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2006 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2006 Toyota Highlander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Highlander (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Highlander (301 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ak 350 | 2006 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | Ak 350 | Highlander |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 3310 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 72 L |