1964 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2008 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2008 Isuzu KB is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 3,165 cc, 2008 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Isuzu KB weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Because 2008 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu KB (265 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Citroen Ak 350 | 2008 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
| Model | Ak 350 | KB |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 3165 cc |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 41 Nm | 265 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 1670 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 17.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 75 L |
