1964 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2008 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 1,308 cc, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Because 2008 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen Ak 350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda RX-8 (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ak 350 | 2008 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Ak 350 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 110 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |