1964 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2010 Ford F-450
To start off, 2010 Ford F-450 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-450 (326 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 304 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Because 2010 Ford F-450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford F-450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen Ak 350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-450 (814 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 773 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ak 350 | 2010 Ford F-450 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Ak 350 | F-450 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 326 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 814 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 6670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 4390 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 144 L |