1964 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z

To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 597 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-Z (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2011 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Citroen Ak 350 2011 Honda CR-Z
Make Citroen Honda
Model Ak 350 CR-Z
Year Released 1964 2011
Engine Size 602 cc 1500 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 22 HP 122 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 41 Nm 173 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 1000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline / Electric Hybrid
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Doors 3 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 605 kg 1202 kg
Vehicle Length 3610 mm 4079 mm
Vehicle Width 1490 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2436 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 40 L