1964 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1316 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Because 2011 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo XC60 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 359 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2011 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ak 350 | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ak 350 | XC60 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 41 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2748 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |