1964 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (420 HP) has 398 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Because 2012 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 389 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ak 350 | 2012 Audi R8 | |
Make | Citroen | Audi |
Model | Ak 350 | R8 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 420 HP |
Torque | 41 Nm | 430 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1245 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 90 L |