1964 Citroen Ami vs. 1952 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1964 Citroen Ami is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jeep CJ3A (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 490 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Citroen Ami | 1952 Jeep CJ3A | |
| Make | Citroen | Jeep |
| Model | Ami | CJ3A |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1952 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2040 mm |
