1964 Citroen Ami vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 226 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ami. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 1030 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Citroen Ami | 1996 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Citroen | Renault |
| Model | Ami | Clio |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 250 HP |
| Top Speed | 113 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2490 mm |
