1964 Citroen Ami vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ami would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 315 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ami.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ami | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | Ami | Clio |
Year Released | 1964 | 1998 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 113 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 50 L |