1964 Citroen Ami vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (242 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1330 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Citroen Ami | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | Ami | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3270 mm |
