1964 Citroen Ami vs. 2004 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2004 Skoda Octavia is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Skoda Octavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Skoda Octavia (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Skoda Octavia should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 710 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ami | 2004 Skoda Octavia | |
Make | Citroen | Skoda |
Model | Ami | Octavia |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 113 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 55 L |