1964 Citroen Ami vs. 2006 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2006 Nissan Armada is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 281 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan Armada weights approximately 920 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ami | 2006 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | Ami | Armada |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 5555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 106 L |