1964 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1208 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ami.
Because 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Citroen Ami | 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Citroen | Jeep |
| Model | Ami | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 4701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 113 km/hour | 196 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1828 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 78 L |
