1964 Citroen Ami vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ami.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ami | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | Ami | Clio |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 50 L |