1964 Citroen Ami vs. 2010 Honda Stream
To start off, 2010 Honda Stream is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Honda Stream is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Stream (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Stream should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Stream weights approximately 856 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ami | 2010 Honda Stream | |
Make | Citroen | Honda |
Model | Ami | Stream |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 113 km/hour | 205 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 55 L |