1964 Citroen Ami vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1171 kg more than 1964 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen Ami | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ami | XC60 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1791 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2774 mm |