1964 Citroen DS vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen DS would be higher. At 1,911 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1964 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 53 kg more than 1964 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen DS. (144 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen DS. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1964 Citroen DS has manual transmission. 1964 Citroen DS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Citroen DS | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | DS | Equator |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3260 mm |
