1964 Citroen DS vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ranger (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1964 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 440 kg more than 1964 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Citroen DS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen DS | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | DS | Ranger |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |