1964 Citroen DS vs. 2006 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2006 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen DS would be higher. At 1,911 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Hyundai Matrix (102 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1964 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Hyundai Matrix should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 46 kg more than 1964 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen DS | 2006 Hyundai Matrix | |
Make | Citroen | Hyundai |
Model | DS | Matrix |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |