1964 Citroen DS vs. 2010 Buick LaCrosse
To start off, 2010 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen DS would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Buick LaCrosse (255 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1964 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 546 kg more than 1964 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Citroen DS | 2010 Buick LaCrosse | |
Make | Citroen | Buick |
Model | DS | LaCrosse |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1826 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5001 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1857 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2837 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |