1964 DKW F 102 vs. 1982 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1982 Seat Ronda is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 1,438 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Seat Ronda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Seat Ronda (74 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1964 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ronda should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 DKW F 102 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Seat Ronda (113 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1982 Seat Ronda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW F 102 | 1982 Seat Ronda | |
| Make | DKW | Seat |
| Model | F 102 | Ronda |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 1438 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 113 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2460 mm |
