1964 DKW F 102 vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 1,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (98 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1964 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 DKW F 102 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (131 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1983 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW F 102 | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | DKW | Fiat |
| Model | F 102 | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 1568 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 98 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 71.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 905 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |
