1964 DKW F 102 vs. 1989 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1989 Toyota Celica is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Toyota Celica (201 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1964 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Toyota Celica weights approximately 610 kg more than 1964 DKW F 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 DKW F 102. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Toyota Celica (275 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1989 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW F 102 | 1989 Toyota Celica | |
Make | DKW | Toyota |
Model | F 102 | Celica |
Year Released | 1964 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1175 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 275 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |