1964 DKW F 102 vs. 1996 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1996 Mercury Cougar is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 3,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 710 kg more than 1964 DKW F 102.
Because 1996 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW F 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW F 102 | 1996 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | DKW | Mercury |
| Model | F 102 | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 3798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1860 mm |
