1964 DKW F 102 vs. 2000 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 DKW F 102. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Dakota (576 Nm) has 473 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 102. (103 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW F 102 | 2000 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | DKW | Dodge |
Model | F 102 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1175 cc | 4699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 103 Nm | 576 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2850 mm |