1964 DKW F 102 vs. 2003 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1964 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW F 102.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 DKW F 102. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW F 102 | 2003 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | DKW | Holden |
Model | F 102 | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1175 cc | 3494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3060 mm |