1964 DKW F 102 vs. 2005 Lotus Exige
To start off, 2005 Lotus Exige is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lotus Exige is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lotus Exige (396 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 337 more horse power than 1964 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lotus Exige should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 DKW F 102 weights approximately 60 kg more than 2005 Lotus Exige.
Because 2005 Lotus Exige is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Lotus Exige. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW F 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lotus Exige (400 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2005 Lotus Exige will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW F 102 | 2005 Lotus Exige | |
| Make | DKW | Lotus |
| Model | F 102 | Exige |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 2998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 396 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7750 RPM |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2310 mm |
