1964 DKW F 102 vs. 2006 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2006 Renault Scenic is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 1,869 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Scenic (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1964 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW F 102.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Scenic (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW F 102 | 2006 Renault Scenic | |
| Make | DKW | Renault |
| Model | F 102 | Scenic |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 1869 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 93 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |
