1964 DKW F 102 vs. 2009 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2009 Holden Caprice is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 219 more horse power than 1964 DKW F 102. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW F 102.
Because 2009 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW F 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 102. (103 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 102. 2009 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1964 DKW F 102 has manual transmission. 1964 DKW F 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW F 102 | 2009 Holden Caprice | |
Make | DKW | Holden |
Model | F 102 | Caprice |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1175 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 103 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |