1964 DKW F 102 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1964 DKW F 102. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW F 102.
Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW F 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 102. (103 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW F 102 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | DKW | Holden |
| Model | F 102 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
