1964 DKW F 11 vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1964 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 740 kg more than 1964 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 11. (72 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW F 11 | 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | DKW | Mitsubishi |
| Model | F 11 | Sigma |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 72 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2730 mm |
