1964 DKW F 11 vs. 1995 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Jaguar XJ220 (968 Nm) has 896 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 11. (72 Nm). This means 1995 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW F 11 | 1995 Jaguar XJ220 | |
Make | DKW | Jaguar |
Model | F 11 | XJ220 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 3492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 72 Nm | 968 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |