1964 DKW F 11 vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 796 cc (3 cylinders), 1964 DKW F 11 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1964 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 DKW F 11 weights approximately 274 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Because 2000 Lotus Extreme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Extreme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 11. (72 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW F 11 | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
Make | DKW | Lotus |
Model | F 11 | Extreme |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 700 cc |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 72 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2420 mm |