1964 DKW F 11 vs. 2002 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2002 Suzuki Covie is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2002 Suzuki Covie is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Suzuki Covie (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1964 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Covie should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki Covie weights approximately 20 kg more than 1964 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Suzuki Covie (111 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 11. (72 Nm). This means 2002 Suzuki Covie will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW F 11 | 2002 Suzuki Covie | |
| Make | DKW | Suzuki |
| Model | F 11 | Covie |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 72 Nm | 111 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 2950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 35 L |
