1964 DKW F 11 vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,308 cc, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1964 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW F 11.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 11. (72 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW F 11 | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | F 11 | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 1308 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 8200 RPM |
| Torque | 72 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2710 mm |
