1964 DKW F 11 vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 222 more horse power than 1964 DKW F 11. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW F 11.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 75 (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 11. (72 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW F 11 | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | DKW | Rover |
Model | F 11 | 75 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 256 HP |
Torque | 72 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 65 L |